On The Hardships of Life and The Choices We Make
What hardship takes—and what we refuse to let it take.
I used to believe hardship revealed character. That belief made life easier to organize. It gave suffering a clean role—something like a test. You go through something difficult, and what’s already inside you gets exposed: strength, weakness, patience, fear. It’s all there, waiting for pressure to bring it out. It’s a reassuring idea. It’s also incomplete.
Because I’ve watched hardship do something far less orderly than reveal. I’ve watched it rewrite people. I’ve experienced it rewrite me. Not temporarily, not in ways that fade with time. I’ve seen it take something stable and make it unstable, take something open and close it, take someone who trusted easily and leave them scanning every room for threat—even when nothing is there. And the part that unsettled me wasn’t just that it happened. It is that no one chose it. Something in you shifts under pressure, and whatever you were before doesn’t fully come back.
That breaks the simple story. It means hardship is not just a test. It is an intervention. It enters your life and exerts force—on your thinking, your reactions, your expectations—until something gives. And sometimes what gives is not situational. Sometimes it’s structural. So now the question changes. If hardship can alter you in ways you didn’t choose, then what exactly are your choices?
I tried, for a while, to answer that question by reducing responsibility. It felt honest to say that given enough pressure, anyone changes—that what we call “choice” is often just the surface expression of deeper forces—history, biology, timing—stacking in ways we don’t control. There is truth in that. But if you stay there, something else happens. You don’t just explain your behavior. You abandon authorship. Not all at once, not dramatically. You don’t declare it. You just stop seeing your life as something you are shaping.
And once that happens, your decisions start to narrow. You protect more. Risk less. Expect less. You call it realism. You call it maturity. You tell yourself you’ve learned. But if you look closely—really look—you can see the shift. Your life hasn’t become clearer. It has become smaller. That’s the part no one says out loud. Hardship doesn’t just hurt you. It pulls you—quietly, repeatedly—toward contraction, toward a version of life where you are less exposed, less invested, less available to what might go wrong again. It feels like protection. It’s actually trajectory.
And once I saw that, I couldn’t unsee it. Not in other people. In myself. There was a point—after something I still don’t reduce to a sentence—where I noticed I had stopped trying in a specific direction. Not consciously. I hadn’t made a decision. I had just stopped. And when I looked at it honestly, there was a reason. It hadn’t worked before. It had cost me something I didn’t want to pay again. And without saying it out loud, I had rewritten the rule: don’t go there anymore. It felt rational. It felt earned. And it was shrinking me.
That’s when the argument stopped being something I believed. It became something I was inside of. Because the real decision isn’t whether hardship changes you. It will. The real decision is whether you let it decide the direction of that change. That is the margin. Not control. Not mastery. Just a narrow, stubborn space where something is still undecided.
And it’s easy to misunderstand where that space actually exists. Your choices are not about what you feel. You don’t choose the hesitation, the fear, the instinct to withdraw, the suspicion that wasn’t there before. Those often arrive uninvited—carried forward from what has already changed inside you. You don’t choose those. Your choices begin one layer after that. They exist in what you do with what arises. You hesitate—that’s not the choice. Whether you speak anyway or stay silent, that is. You feel the pull to close off—that’s not the choice. Whether you follow it completely, partially, or resist it, that is. You think this will probably fail again—you didn’t choose that thought. But whether you let it decide your next move, that’s where choice lives.
And even there, it isn’t absolute. Sometimes the margin is wide—you can see clearly and decide deliberately. Sometimes it’s razor thin. Sometimes the only choice available is to move five percent against the pattern, to say slightly more than you would have, to try once when you wouldn’t have, to stay engaged for a moment longer than feels justified. That still counts. Because choice, here, is not about overriding what you’ve become. It’s about refusing to let it become total.
And that distinction—small as it sounds—decides more than people think. Because the cost of choosing safety is not immediate. It accumulates. A little less honesty. A little less effort. A little less openness. Nothing dramatic. Nothing anyone could point to and say, that’s where it changed. But over time, those decisions don’t just shape your behavior. They shape your range—what you’re willing to try, what you believe is possible, what kind of life you think is still available to you. And eventually, you don’t feel like you’re choosing anymore. You feel like you’re just being realistic.
That’s how contraction completes itself. Not through one defining moment, but through a series of reasonable decisions that close the door one inch at a time. I’ve seen where that ends. Because I’ve felt it starting. There is a version of your life that still functions. You meet expectations. You move forward in ways that look stable from the outside. But something is gone. Not dramatically. Not in a way that alarms anyone. Just quietly—you stop reaching in certain directions. And after a while, you don’t even notice what’s missing.
I’ve felt this contraction many times as I’ve stood at my son's grave.
That’s the part that stays with me. Not the hardship itself. The realization of how little it takes, over time, to reduce a life without ever deciding to.
So the choice becomes sharper. Not easier—sharper. You are no longer choosing between pain and no pain. You are choosing between two forms of loss: the immediate risk of staying open in a world that doesn’t guarantee fairness, or the slower, quieter loss of becoming someone who no longer reaches beyond what feels safe. There is no version of this where you avoid cost. That’s the part worth saying plainly.
And this is where most writing about hardship stops short. It tries to preserve hope by softening the terms, by suggesting that if you respond well enough, things will improve, resolve, reward you in some way that justifies the effort. I don’t think that’s reliable.
What I think is this: hardship takes something from you. The only question is whether it gets to take your range with it. Because range is what determines the life you’re still capable of living—your willingness to try again, to trust again, to think beyond what’s already happened to you, to act in ways that are not entirely dictated by your past. Lose that, and your world contracts, even if everything else appears intact. Keep it, and you remain in motion, even if nothing is guaranteed.
That’s what I now think strength actually is. Not resilience as recovery. Not the ability to return to who you were before. That version is gone in ways you may not fully understand. Strength is something else. It’s the decision—repeated, uneven, sometimes quiet to the point of invisibility—to not let what happened to you become the limit of what you are willing to do next.
You won’t do this perfectly. I don’t. There are still places I avoid. That doesn’t disappear just because you understand it. But over time, those moments accumulate in one direction or the other—toward contraction or toward range. And that, more than anything that happens to you, determines the shape of your life. Not whether hardship came, not whether it was fair, not even whether it changed you, but whether, after it did, you allowed it to quietly decide how much of your life was still available to you.
Return to My Essays